Autor/es de la URV: | Carles Lavila, Misericòrdia / Hernández Leal, María José / Pérez Lacasta, Maria José |
Autor según el artículo: | Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose; Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose; Feijoo-Cid, Maria; Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa; Carles-Lavila, Misericordia |
Direcció de correo del autor: | mariajose.hernandezl@estudiants.urv.cat mariajose.hernandezl@estudiants.urv.cat mariajose.perez@urv.cat misericordia.carles@urv.cat |
Identificador del autor: | 0000-0002-4002-6454 0000-0002-4002-6454 0000-0001-5906-5632 0000-0003-3796-3014 |
Año de publicación de la revista: | 2021 |
Tipo de publicación: | Journal Publications |
ISSN: | 0738-3991 |
Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: | Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose; Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose; Feijoo-Cid, Maria; Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa; Carles-Lavila, Misericordia (2021). Healthcare professionals’ behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review. Patient Education And Counseling, 104(8), 1933-1944. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.032 |
Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: | Patient Education And Counseling. 104 (8): 1933-1944 |
Resumen: | ObjectiveTo explore the barriers to and facilitators of healthcare professionals' implementation of SDM regarding screening programmes.MethodA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, and PsyscInfo. The barriers and facilitators identified were classified into three factors based on their origin: patients, healthcare system performance, and healthcare professionals themselves.ResultsEight studies were selected: seven related to cancer screening. The most significant facilitators were literacy and interest in active participation, both of which have their origins in patients. The most significant barriers identified for the first time in a systematic review were legal conflict, lack of remuneration and lack of flexibility in clinical guidelines in screening programmes.ConclusionThe results of this study show that there are differences between barriers and facilitators for SDM when it is applied in the context of healthy people who perform preventive activities, particularly screening, in contrast to general medical consultation contexts.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest that to advance in the practice of SDM, we need to develop and disseminate training documents. Further, SDM should be incorporated into clinical guidelines. There should be more studies focusing on healthcare professionals' behaviour within the context of the uncertainty of screening programmes. |
DOI del artículo: | 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.032 |
Enlace a la fuente original: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399121000598 |
Versión del articulo depositado: | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
Acceso a la licencia de uso: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ |
Departamento: | Economia |
URL Documento de licencia: | https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/ |
Áreas temáticas: | Sociologia i política Social sciences, interdisciplinary Saúde coletiva Public, environmental & occupational health Nursing Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicine (all) Medicina iii Medicina i General o multidisciplinar General medicine Farmacia Enfermagem Educação física Ciencias sociales |
Palabras clave: | Uncertainty Systematic review Shared decision-making Shared decision making Screening programmes Review Remuneration Prostate-cancer Professionals salut Presa de decisions compartides, toma de decisiones compartidas Practice guideline Patient participation Participation in preventive health Medline Mass screening Male Literacy Humans Human Healthcare professional Health personnel Health care system Health care personnel Female Decision making, shared Decision making Consultation Cochrane library Cancer screening Adult support spain screening programmes physicians people patient empowerment participation in preventive health participation healthcare professional expectations consultation barriers |
Entidad: | Universitat Rovira i Virgili |
Fecha de alta del registro: | 2025-01-08 |
Descripción: | ObjectiveTo explore the barriers to and facilitators of healthcare professionals' implementation of SDM regarding screening programmes.MethodA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, and PsyscInfo. The barriers and facilitators identified were classified into three factors based on their origin: patients, healthcare system performance, and healthcare professionals themselves.ResultsEight studies were selected: seven related to cancer screening. The most significant facilitators were literacy and interest in active participation, both of which have their origins in patients. The most significant barriers identified for the first time in a systematic review were legal conflict, lack of remuneration and lack of flexibility in clinical guidelines in screening programmes.ConclusionThe results of this study show that there are differences between barriers and facilitators for SDM when it is applied in the context of healthy people who perform preventive activities, particularly screening, in contrast to general medical consultation contexts.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest that to advance in the practice of SDM, we need to develop and disseminate training documents. Further, SDM should be incorporated into clinical guidelines. There should be more studies focusing on healthcare professionals' behaviour within the context of the uncertainty of screening programmes. |
Cobertura: | Anglès |
Tipo: | Journal Publications |
Coautor: | Universitat Rovira i Virgili |
Títol: | Healthcare professionals’ behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review |
Materia: | Medicine (Miscellaneous),Nursing,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health,Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary Uncertainty Systematic review Shared decision-making Shared decision making Screening programmes Review Remuneration Prostate-cancer Professionals salut Presa de decisions compartides, toma de decisiones compartidas Practice guideline Patient participation Participation in preventive health Medline Mass screening Male Literacy Humans Human Healthcare professional Health personnel Health care system Health care personnel Female Decision making, shared Decision making Consultation Cochrane library Cancer screening Adult support spain screening programmes physicians people patient empowerment participation in preventive health participation healthcare professional expectations consultation barriers Sociologia i política Social sciences, interdisciplinary Saúde coletiva Public, environmental & occupational health Nursing Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicine (all) Medicina iii Medicina i General o multidisciplinar General medicine Farmacia Enfermagem Educação física Ciencias sociales |
Fecha: | 2021 |
Autor: | Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose Feijoo-Cid, Maria Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa Carles-Lavila, Misericordia |
Derechos: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Busca tu registro en: |
Archivo | Descripción | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DocumentPrincipal | DocumentPrincipal | application/pdf |
© 2011 Universitat Rovira i Virgili