Repositori institucional URV
Español Català English
TÍTULO:
Healthcare professionals’ behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review - imarina:9156698

Autor/es de la URV:Carles Lavila, Misericòrdia / Hernández Leal, María José / Pérez Lacasta, Maria José
Autor según el artículo:Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose; Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose; Feijoo-Cid, Maria; Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa; Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
Direcció de correo del autor:mariajose.hernandezl@estudiants.urv.cat
mariajose.hernandezl@estudiants.urv.cat
mariajose.perez@urv.cat
misericordia.carles@urv.cat
Identificador del autor:0000-0002-4002-6454
0000-0002-4002-6454
0000-0001-5906-5632
0000-0003-3796-3014
Año de publicación de la revista:2021
Tipo de publicación:Journal Publications
ISSN:0738-3991
Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA:Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose; Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose; Feijoo-Cid, Maria; Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa; Carles-Lavila, Misericordia (2021). Healthcare professionals’ behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review. Patient Education And Counseling, 104(8), 1933-1944. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.032
Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial:Patient Education And Counseling. 104 (8): 1933-1944
Resumen:ObjectiveTo explore the barriers to and facilitators of healthcare professionals' implementation of SDM regarding screening programmes.MethodA systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, and PsyscInfo. The barriers and facilitators identified were classified into three factors based on their origin: patients, healthcare system performance, and healthcare professionals themselves.ResultsEight studies were selected: seven related to cancer screening. The most significant facilitators were literacy and interest in active participation, both of which have their origins in patients. The most significant barriers identified for the first time in a systematic review were legal conflict, lack of remuneration and lack of flexibility in clinical guidelines in screening programmes.ConclusionThe results of this study show that there are differences between barriers and facilitators for SDM when it is applied in the context of healthy people who perform preventive activities, particularly screening, in contrast to general medical consultation contexts.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest that to advance in the practice of SDM, we need to develop and disseminate training documents. Further, SDM should be incorporated into clinical guidelines. There should be more studies focusing on healthcare professionals' behaviour within the context of the uncertainty of screening programmes.
DOI del artículo:10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.032
Enlace a la fuente original:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399121000598
Versión del articulo depositado:info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
Acceso a la licencia de uso:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
Departamento:Economia
URL Documento de licencia:https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
Áreas temáticas:Sociologia i política
Social sciences, interdisciplinary
Saúde coletiva
Public, environmental & occupational health
Nursing
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Medicine (all)
Medicina iii
Medicina i
General o multidisciplinar
General medicine
Farmacia
Enfermagem
Educação física
Ciencias sociales
Palabras clave:Uncertainty
Systematic review
Shared decision-making
Shared decision making
Screening programmes
Review
Remuneration
Prostate-cancer
Professionals salut
Presa de decisions compartides, toma de decisiones compartidas
Practice guideline
Patient participation
Participation in preventive health
Medline
Mass screening
Male
Literacy
Humans
Human
Healthcare professional
Health personnel
Health care system
Health care personnel
Female
Decision making, shared
Decision making
Consultation
Cochrane library
Cancer screening
Adult
support
spain
screening programmes
physicians
people
patient empowerment
participation in preventive health
participation
healthcare professional
expectations
consultation
barriers
Entidad:Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Fecha de alta del registro:2025-01-08
Busca tu registro en:

Archivos desponibles
ArchivoDescripciónFormato
DocumentPrincipalDocumentPrincipalapplication/pdf

Información

© 2011 Universitat Rovira i Virgili