Repositori institucional URV
Español Català English
TÍTULO:
Language and the use of law are predictive of judge gender and seniority - imarina:9386995

Autor/es de la URV:Guimera Manrique, Roger / Nasarre Aznar, Sergio / Piga, Angelo / Sales Pardo, Marta
Autor según el artículo:Font-Pomarol, Lluc; Piga, Angelo; Nasarre-Aznar, Sergio; Sales-Pardo, Marta; Guimera, Roger
Direcció de correo del autor:marta.sales@urv.cat
sergio.nasarre@urv.cat
roger.guimera@urv.cat
Identificador del autor:0000-0002-8140-6525
0000-0001-9086-2533
0000-0002-3597-4310
Año de publicación de la revista:2024
Tipo de publicación:Journal Publications
Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA:Font-Pomarol, Lluc; Piga, Angelo; Nasarre-Aznar, Sergio; Sales-Pardo, Marta; Guimera, Roger (2024). Language and the use of law are predictive of judge gender and seniority. Epj Data Science, 13(1), 57-. DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00494-x
Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial:Epj Data Science. 13 (1): 57-
Resumen:There are examples of how unconscious bias can influence actions of people. In the judiciary, however, despite some examples there is no general theory on whether different demographic attributes such as gender, seniority or ethnicity affect case sentencing. We aim to gain insight into this issue by analyzing over 100k decisions of three different areas of law with the goal of understanding whether judge identity or judge attributes such as gender and seniority can be inferred from decision documents. We find that stylistic features of decisions are predictive of judge identities, their gender and their seniority, a finding that is aligned with results from analysis of written texts outside the judiciary. Surprisingly, we find that features based on legislation cited are also predictive of judge identities and attributes. While own content reuse by judges can explain our ability to predict judge identities, no specific reduced set of features can explain the differences we find in the legislation cited of decisions when we group judges by gender or seniority. Our findings open the door for further research on how these differences translate into how judges apply the law and, ultimately, to promote a more transparent and fair judiciary system.
DOI del artículo:10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00494-x
Enlace a la fuente original:https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00494-x
Versión del articulo depositado:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Acceso a la licencia de uso:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
Departamento:Enginyeria Química
URL Documento de licencia:https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
Áreas temáticas:Ciência da computação
Ciencias sociales
Computational mathematics
Computer science applications
Engenharias i
Engenharias iv
Mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
Modeling and simulation
Social sciences, mathematical methods
Palabras clave:Gender differences
Judicial decision
Judicial decisions
Topic model
Entidad:Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Fecha de alta del registro:2024-10-19
Busca tu registro en:

Archivos desponibles
ArchivoDescripciónFormato
DocumentPrincipalDocumentPrincipalapplication/pdf

Información

© 2011 Universitat Rovira i Virgili