Articles producció científica> Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques

Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study

  • Dades identificatives

    Identificador: imarina:6157277
    Autors:
    Berra, SilvinaRavens-Sieberer, UlrikeErhart, MichaelTebe, CristianBisegger, CorinnaDuer, Wolfgangvon Rueden, UrsulaHerdman, MichaelAlonso, JordiRajmil, LuisEuropean KIDSCREEN Grp
    Resum:
    Background: The objective of the present study was to compare three different sampling and questionnaire administration methods used in the international KIDSCREEN study in terms of participation, response rates, and external validity. Methods: Children and adolescents aged 8-18 years were surveyed in 13 European countries using either telephone sampling and mail administration, random sampling of school listings followed by classroom or mail administration, or multistage random sampling of communities and households with self-administration of the survey materials at home. Cooperation, completion, and response rates were compared across countries and survey methods. Data on non-respondents was collected in 8 countries. The population fraction (PF, respondents in each sex-age, or educational level category, divided by the population in the same category from Eurostat census data) and population fraction ratio (PFR, ratio of PF) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze differences by country between the KIDSCREEN samples and a reference Eurostat population. Results: Response rates by country ranged from 18.9% to 91.2%. Response rates were highest in the school-based surveys (69.0%-91.2%). Sample proportions by age and gender were similar to the reference Eurostat population in most countries, although boys and adolescents were slightly underrepresented (PFR < 1). Parents in lower educational categories were less likely to participate (PFR < 1 in 5 countries). Parents in higher educational categories were overrepresented when the school and household sampling strategies were used (PFR = 1.78-2.97). Conclusion: School-based sampling achieved the highest overall response rates but also produced slightly more biased samples than the other meth
  • Altres:

    Autor segons l'article: Berra, Silvina Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike Erhart, Michael Tebe, Cristian Bisegger, Corinna Duer, Wolfgang von Rueden, Ursula Herdman, Michael Alonso, Jordi Rajmil, Luis European KIDSCREEN Grp
    Departament: Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques
    Autor/s de la URV: TEBÉ CORDOMÍ, CRISTIAN
    Paraules clau: IQOLA project Questionnaires RESPONSE RATES
    Resum: Background: The objective of the present study was to compare three different sampling and questionnaire administration methods used in the international KIDSCREEN study in terms of participation, response rates, and external validity. Methods: Children and adolescents aged 8-18 years were surveyed in 13 European countries using either telephone sampling and mail administration, random sampling of school listings followed by classroom or mail administration, or multistage random sampling of communities and households with self-administration of the survey materials at home. Cooperation, completion, and response rates were compared across countries and survey methods. Data on non-respondents was collected in 8 countries. The population fraction (PF, respondents in each sex-age, or educational level category, divided by the population in the same category from Eurostat census data) and population fraction ratio (PFR, ratio of PF) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze differences by country between the KIDSCREEN samples and a reference Eurostat population. Results: Response rates by country ranged from 18.9% to 91.2%. Response rates were highest in the school-based surveys (69.0%-91.2%). Sample proportions by age and gender were similar to the reference Eurostat population in most countries, although boys and adolescents were slightly underrepresented (PFR < 1). Parents in lower educational categories were less likely to participate (PFR < 1 in 5 countries). Parents in higher educational categories were overrepresented when the school and household sampling strategies were used (PFR = 1.78-2.97). Conclusion: School-based sampling achieved the highest overall response rates but also produced slightly more biased samples than the other methods. The results suggest that the samples were sufficiently representative to provide reference population values for the KIDSCREEN instrument.
    Àrees temàtiques: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    Accès a la llicència d'ús: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Adreça de correu electrònic de l'autor: cristian.tebe@urv.cat
    ISSN: 14712458
    Identificador de l'autor: 0000-0003-2320-1385
    Data d'alta del registre: 2020-07-16
    Versió de l'article dipositat: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Enllaç font original: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-7-182
    Referència a l'article segons font original: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH. (ISSN/ISBN: 14712458). 7(182): 182
    Referència de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Berra, Silvina; Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike; Erhart, Michael; Tebe, Cristian; Bisegger, Corinna; Duer, Wolfgang; von Rueden, Ursula; Herdman, Michael; Alonso, Jordi; Rajmil, Luis; European KIDSCREEN Grp (2007). Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. , 7(182), -. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-182
    URL Document de llicència: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    DOI de l'article: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-182
    Entitat: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Any de publicació de la revista: 2007
    Tipus de publicació: Journal Publications
  • Paraules clau:

    Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    IQOLA project
    Questionnaires
    RESPONSE RATES
    Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    14712458
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar