Bayesian Machine Scientist to Compare Data Collapses for the Nikuradse Dataset

Identifier:  imarina:6389816

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina6389816

Authors:  Reichardt, I; Pallarès, J; Sales-Pardo, M; Guimerà, R

Abstract:
© 2020 American Physical Society. Ever since Nikuradse's experiments on turbulent friction in 1933, there have been theoretical attempts to describe his measurements by collapsing the data into single-variable functions. However, this approach, which is common in other areas of physics and in other fields, is limited by the lack of rigorous quantitative methods to compare alternative data collapses. Here, we address this limitation by using an unsupervised method to find analytic functions that optimally describe each of the data collapses for the Nikuradse dataset. By descaling these analytic functions, we show that a low dispersion of the scaled data does not guarantee that a data collapse is a good description of the original data. In fact, we find that, out of all the proposed data collapses, the original one proposed by Prandtl and Nikuradse over 80 years ago provides the best description of the data so far, and that it also agrees well with recent experimental data, provided that some model parameters are allowed to vary across experiments.