Determination of synthetic cathinones in urine and oral fluid by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry and low-resolution mass spectrometry: A method comparison

Identifier:  imarina:9002806

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina9002806

Authors:  Pascual-Caro, S; Borrull, F; Aguilar, C; Calull, M

Abstract:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Synthetic cathinones have become very popular recreational drugs. Therefore, determining them in biological samples is now a matter of concern. In recent years, different methods that have been developed can determine these drugs at low-concentration levels. In general, liquid chromatography mass spectrometry detection plays an important role in these methods and the trend is to use low-resolution and high-resolution mass spectrometry. In this article, for the first time, we compare these two analyzers using an Orbitrap and a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in order to determine a group of synthetic cathinones in urine and oral fluid samples. For this comparison, we evaluated and compared different parameters: Method detection and quantification limits, linearity, apparent recoveries, matrix effect, repeatability (intra-day), reproducibility (inter-day), and accuracy. Similar results were obtained for the two analyzers for the apparent recoveries and matrix effect. However, triple quadrupole showed higher sensitivity compared to Orbitrap for both urine and oral fluid samples. The quantification limits in urine and the detection limits in saliva were two times lower for triple quadrupole. Finally, when blind samples were analyzed to study the accuracy, similar results were obtained for both analyzers.