Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

Clinical outcomes and safety of passive leg raising in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:9216929
    Authors:
    Azeli, YoucefBardaji, AlfredoBarberia, EnekoLopez-Madrid, VanesaBlade-Creixenti, JordiFernandez-Sender, LauraBonet, GilRica, ElenaAlvarez, SusanaFernandez, AlbertoAxelsson, ChristerJimenez-Herrera, Maria F
    Abstract:
    Background: There are data suggesting that passive leg raising (PLR) improves hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of PLR during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the outcomes that assigned adults OHCA to be treated with PLR or in the flat position. The trial was conducted in the Camp de Tarragona region. The main end point was survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome defined as cerebral performance category (CPC 1–2). To study possible adverse effects, we assessed the presence of pulmonary complications on the first chest X-rays, brain edema on the computerized tomography (CT) in survivors and brain and lungs weights from autopsies in non-survivors. Results: In total, 588 randomized cases were included, 301 were treated with PLR and 287 were controls. Overall, 67.8% were men and the median age was 72 (IQR 60–82) years. At hospital discharge, 3.3% in the PLR group and 3.5% in the control group were alive with CPC 1–2 (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4–2.3, p = 0.91). No significant differences in survival at hospital admission were found in all patients (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.7–1.6, p = 0.95) and among patients with an initial shockable rhythm (OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.8–3.4, p = 0.15). There were no differences in pulmonary complication rates in chest X-rays [7 (25.9%) vs 5 (17.9%), p = 0.47] and brain edema on CT [5 (29.4%) vs 10 (32.6%), p = 0.84]. There were no differences in lung weight [1223 mg (IQR 909–1500) vs 1239 mg (IQR 900–1507), p = 0.82] or brain weight [1352 mg (IQR 1227–1457) vs 1380 mg (IQR 1255–1470), p = 0.43] among the 106 autopsies performed. Conclusion: In this trial, PLR during CPR did n
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Azeli, Youcef; Bardaji, Alfredo; Barberia, Eneko; Lopez-Madrid, Vanesa; Blade-Creixenti, Jordi; Fernandez-Sender, Laura; Bonet, Gil; Rica, Elena; Alvarez, Susana; Fernandez, Alberto; Axelsson, Christer; Jimenez-Herrera, Maria F
    Department: Enginyeria Química Infermeria Medicina i Cirurgia Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques
    URV's Author/s: Alvarez Fernandez, Susana Maria / Barberia Marcalain, Eneko / Bardají Ruiz, Alfredo / Bonet Pineda, Gil / Fernández Sabater, Alberto / Jiménez Herrera, María Francisca
    Keywords: Treatment outcome Tidal carbon-dioxide Survival Range of motion, articular Porcine model Perfusion pressures Performance Patient safety Passive leg raising Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Middle aged Male Leg Hypothermia Humans Hospitalization Female Cpr Coronary Circulation Chi-square distribution Cardiopulmonary-resuscitation Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Aged, 80 and over Aged Adverse effect
    Abstract: Background: There are data suggesting that passive leg raising (PLR) improves hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This trial aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of PLR during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of the outcomes that assigned adults OHCA to be treated with PLR or in the flat position. The trial was conducted in the Camp de Tarragona region. The main end point was survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome defined as cerebral performance category (CPC 1–2). To study possible adverse effects, we assessed the presence of pulmonary complications on the first chest X-rays, brain edema on the computerized tomography (CT) in survivors and brain and lungs weights from autopsies in non-survivors. Results: In total, 588 randomized cases were included, 301 were treated with PLR and 287 were controls. Overall, 67.8% were men and the median age was 72 (IQR 60–82) years. At hospital discharge, 3.3% in the PLR group and 3.5% in the control group were alive with CPC 1–2 (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4–2.3, p = 0.91). No significant differences in survival at hospital admission were found in all patients (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.7–1.6, p = 0.95) and among patients with an initial shockable rhythm (OR 1.7; 95% CI 0.8–3.4, p = 0.15). There were no differences in pulmonary complication rates in chest X-rays [7 (25.9%) vs 5 (17.9%), p = 0.47] and brain edema on CT [5 (29.4%) vs 10 (32.6%), p = 0.84]. There were no differences in lung weight [1223 mg (IQR 909–1500) vs 1239 mg (IQR 900–1507), p = 0.82] or brain weight [1352 mg (IQR 1227–1457) vs 1380 mg (IQR 1255–1470), p = 0.43] among the 106 autopsies performed. Conclusion: In this trial, PLR during CPR did not improve survival to hospital discharge with CPC 1–2. No evidence of adverse effects has been found. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01952197, registration date: September 27, 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01952197. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
    Thematic Areas: Saúde coletiva Nutrição Medicina veterinaria Medicina iii Medicina ii Medicina i Interdisciplinar Farmacia Engenharias iv Enfermagem Educação física Critical care medicine Critical care and intensive care medicine Ciências biológicas iii Ciências biológicas ii Ciências biológicas i Ciência de alimentos Biotecnología
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Author's mail: gil.bonet@urv.cat eneko.barberia@urv.cat alberto.fernandez@urv.cat maria.jimenez@urv.cat alfredo.bardaji@urv.cat susana.alvarez@urv.cat eneko.barberia@urv.cat
    Author identifier: 0000-0001-5804-3597 0000-0002-1241-1646 0000-0003-2599-3742 0000-0003-1900-6974 0000-0002-1376-2034 0000-0001-5804-3597
    Record's date: 2024-10-12
    Papper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Link to the original source: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-021-03593-7
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Papper original source: Critical Care. 25 (1): 176-
    APA: Azeli, Youcef; Bardaji, Alfredo; Barberia, Eneko; Lopez-Madrid, Vanesa; Blade-Creixenti, Jordi; Fernandez-Sender, Laura; Bonet, Gil; Rica, Elena; Alva (2021). Clinical outcomes and safety of passive leg raising in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care, 25(1), 176-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03593-7
    Article's DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03593-7
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2021
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Critical Care Medicine
    Treatment outcome
    Tidal carbon-dioxide
    Survival
    Range of motion, articular
    Porcine model
    Perfusion pressures
    Performance
    Patient safety
    Passive leg raising
    Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Middle aged
    Male
    Leg
    Hypothermia
    Humans
    Hospitalization
    Female
    Cpr
    Coronary
    Circulation
    Chi-square distribution
    Cardiopulmonary-resuscitation
    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Aged, 80 and over
    Aged
    Adverse effect
    Saúde coletiva
    Nutrição
    Medicina veterinaria
    Medicina iii
    Medicina ii
    Medicina i
    Interdisciplinar
    Farmacia
    Engenharias iv
    Enfermagem
    Educação física
    Critical care medicine
    Critical care and intensive care medicine
    Ciências biológicas iii
    Ciências biológicas ii
    Ciências biológicas i
    Ciência de alimentos
    Biotecnología
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar