Articles producció científica> Estudis Anglesos i Alemanys

Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics

  • Datos identificativos

    Identificador: imarina:9242161
    Autores:
    Leivada EMurphy E
    Resumen:
    Linguistics is a relatively young field. The birth of a new, vibrant field of research often brings with it certain challenges such as the initial absence of an uncontroversial canon and a certain lack of terminological clarity. Following the example of closely allied disciplines, this work aims to register ambiguities in the use of ten terms in linguistics, with the overarching aim to aid field-internal coherence and field-external visibility. Among other issues, we discuss the influential ‘three factors’ model, labeling, reference, and E-/I-language. Addressing the challenge of looking back while moving forward, we compile a collection of definitions and/or presentations extracted from knowledge-rich contexts for each term, grounded in current usages. We first reflect on previous usages in order to present the first definitions of these terms and track terminological ambiguities that arose throughout their subsequent use. We then attempt to transition towards terminological clarity, providing specific recommendations for a more transparent use of these terms. © 2021 The Author(s)
  • Otros:

    Autor según el artículo: Leivada E; Murphy E
    Departamento: Estudis Anglesos i Alemanys
    Autor/es de la URV: Leivada, Evangelia
    Palabras clave: Three factors Reference Neural signature Labeling I-language E-language
    Resumen: Linguistics is a relatively young field. The birth of a new, vibrant field of research often brings with it certain challenges such as the initial absence of an uncontroversial canon and a certain lack of terminological clarity. Following the example of closely allied disciplines, this work aims to register ambiguities in the use of ten terms in linguistics, with the overarching aim to aid field-internal coherence and field-external visibility. Among other issues, we discuss the influential ‘three factors’ model, labeling, reference, and E-/I-language. Addressing the challenge of looking back while moving forward, we compile a collection of definitions and/or presentations extracted from knowledge-rich contexts for each term, grounded in current usages. We first reflect on previous usages in order to present the first definitions of these terms and track terminological ambiguities that arose throughout their subsequent use. We then attempt to transition towards terminological clarity, providing specific recommendations for a more transparent use of these terms. © 2021 The Author(s)
    Áreas temáticas: Linguistics and language Language and linguistics
    Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Direcció de correo del autor: evelina.leivada@urv.cat
    Fecha de alta del registro: 2024-07-27
    Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: Ampersand. 8
    Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Leivada E; Murphy E (2021). Mind the (terminological) gap: 10 misused, ambiguous, or polysemous terms in linguistics. Ampersand, 8(), -. DOI: 10.1016/j.amper.2021.100073
    Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Año de publicación de la revista: 2021
    Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
  • Palabras clave:

    Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language
    Three factors
    Reference
    Neural signature
    Labeling
    I-language
    E-language
    Linguistics and language
    Language and linguistics
  • Documentos:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar