Articles producció científica> Antropologia, Filosofia i Treball Social

Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries

  • Datos identificativos

    Identificador: imarina:9287621
    Autores:
    Lazzerini, MarziaValente, Emanuelle PessaCovi, BenedettaRozee, VirginieCosta, RaquelOtelea, Marina RuxandraAbderhalden-Zellweger, AlessiaWegrzynowska, MariaLinden, KarolinaArendt, MaryseBrigidi, SerenaMiani, CelinePumpure, ElizabeteRadetic, JelenaDrandic, DanielaCerimagic, AmiraNedberg, Ingvild HersougLiepinaitiene, AlinaRodrigues, Carinade Labrusse, ClaireBaranowska, BarbaraZaigham, MehreenCastaneda, Lara MartinBatram-Zantvoort, StephanieJakovicka, DartaRuzicic, JovanaJuciute, SimonaSantos, TeresaGemperle, MichaelTataj-Puzyna, UrszulaElden, HelenLincetto, OrnellaSacks, EmmaMariani, IlariaMizgaitiene, Marija
    Resumen:
    Objective: To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. Methods: Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarean, and a QMNC index were calculated for births in public versus private facilities. Results: Responses from 25 206 participants were analyzed. Women giving birth in private compared with public facilities reported significantly more frequent total cesarean (32.5% vs 19.0%; aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.52–1.90), elective cesarean (17.3% vs 7.8%; aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.65–2.19), and emergency cesarean before labor (7.4% vs 3.9%; aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.70) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), with analyses by country confirming these results. QMNC index results were heterogeneous across countries and regions in the same country and were largely affected by geographical distribution of regions rather than by type of facility alone. Conclusion: The study confirms that births in private facilities have higher odds of cesarean. It also suggests that QMNC should be closely monitored in all facilities to achieve high-quality care, independent of facility type or geographical distribution. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
  • Otros:

    Autor según el artículo: Lazzerini, Marzia; Valente, Emanuelle Pessa; Covi, Benedetta; Rozee, Virginie; Costa, Raquel; Otelea, Marina Ruxandra; Abderhalden-Zellweger, Alessia; Wegrzynowska, Maria; Linden, Karolina; Arendt, Maryse; Brigidi, Serena; Miani, Celine; Pumpure, Elizabete; Radetic, Jelena; Drandic, Daniela; Cerimagic, Amira; Nedberg, Ingvild Hersoug; Liepinaitiene, Alina; Rodrigues, Carina; de Labrusse, Claire; Baranowska, Barbara; Zaigham, Mehreen; Castaneda, Lara Martin; Batram-Zantvoort, Stephanie; Jakovicka, Darta; Ruzicic, Jovana; Juciute, Simona; Santos, Teresa; Gemperle, Michael; Tataj-Puzyna, Urszula; Elden, Helen; Lincetto, Ornella; Sacks, Emma; Mariani, Ilaria; Mizgaitiene, Marija
    Departamento: Antropologia, Filosofia i Treball Social
    Autor/es de la URV: Brigidi, Serena
    Palabras clave: Who standards Respectful maternity care Quality of care Public facilities Public Private Pregnancy Pandemics Newborn Maternal Infant, newborn Infant health Imagine euro Humans Female Epidemiology Covid-19 Cesarean section who standards sections respectful maternity care quality of care public private newborn maternal imagine euro childbirth
    Resumen: Objective: To explore the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic by facility type among 16 European countries, comparing rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean. Methods: Women who gave birth in the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020, to February 7, 2022, answered a validated online questionnaire. Rates of instrumental birth, instrumental vaginal birth, and cesarean, and a QMNC index were calculated for births in public versus private facilities. Results: Responses from 25 206 participants were analyzed. Women giving birth in private compared with public facilities reported significantly more frequent total cesarean (32.5% vs 19.0%; aOR 1.70; 95% CI 1.52–1.90), elective cesarean (17.3% vs 7.8%; aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.65–2.19), and emergency cesarean before labor (7.4% vs 3.9%; aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.70) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons), with analyses by country confirming these results. QMNC index results were heterogeneous across countries and regions in the same country and were largely affected by geographical distribution of regions rather than by type of facility alone. Conclusion: The study confirms that births in private facilities have higher odds of cesarean. It also suggests that QMNC should be closely monitored in all facilities to achieve high-quality care, independent of facility type or geographical distribution. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
    Áreas temáticas: Saúde coletiva Psicología Planejamento urbano e regional / demografia Odontología Obstetrics and gynecology Obstetrics & gynecology Nutrição Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicina veterinaria Medicina iii Medicina ii Medicina i Interdisciplinar Geociências General medicine Farmacia Engenharias iv Engenharias i Enfermagem Economia Direito Ciências biológicas iii Ciências biológicas ii Ciências biológicas i Ciências ambientais Biotecnología
    Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Direcció de correo del autor: serena.brigidi1@urv.cat
    Identificador del autor: 0000-0001-9325-3880
    Fecha de alta del registro: 2025-02-18
    Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 159 (S1): 22-38
    Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Lazzerini, Marzia; Valente, Emanuelle Pessa; Covi, Benedetta; Rozee, Virginie; Costa, Raquel; Otelea, Marina Ruxandra; Abderhalden-Zellweger, Alessia; (2022). Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries. International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 159(S1), 22-38. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14458
    Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Año de publicación de la revista: 2022
    Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
  • Palabras clave:

    Medicine (Miscellaneous),Obstetrics & Gynecology,Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Who standards
    Respectful maternity care
    Quality of care
    Public facilities
    Public
    Private
    Pregnancy
    Pandemics
    Newborn
    Maternal
    Infant, newborn
    Infant health
    Imagine euro
    Humans
    Female
    Epidemiology
    Covid-19
    Cesarean section
    who standards
    sections
    respectful maternity care
    quality of care
    public
    private
    newborn
    maternal
    imagine euro
    childbirth
    Saúde coletiva
    Psicología
    Planejamento urbano e regional / demografia
    Odontología
    Obstetrics and gynecology
    Obstetrics & gynecology
    Nutrição
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    Medicina veterinaria
    Medicina iii
    Medicina ii
    Medicina i
    Interdisciplinar
    Geociências
    General medicine
    Farmacia
    Engenharias iv
    Engenharias i
    Enfermagem
    Economia
    Direito
    Ciências biológicas iii
    Ciências biológicas ii
    Ciências biológicas i
    Ciências ambientais
    Biotecnología
  • Documentos:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar