Articles producció científica> Infermeria

Healthcare professionals’ editorial opinions on communicating with the public: shifting social media hesitancies

  • Datos identificativos

    Identificador: imarina:9324089
    Autores:
    Alhafez, LinaRubio-Rico, LourdesDiez-Bosch, Miriam
    Resumen:
    The increasing infodemic, changes in the media landscape, and the COVID-19 pandemic have rendered healthcare professionals’ involvement in social media (SoMe) of urgent need. However, research efforts to understand the opinions, needs, and concerns of healthcare professionals (HCP) tackling this new responsibility have been limited, despite being necessary for designing efficient support for them. In this article we look at varying opinions and attitudes published by HCPs towards the use of SoMe as a tool to communicate health-related information to the public: How did their attitudes develop since the decade preceding the COVID-19 outbreak and what were their main expressed concerns over the years. We conducted a qualitative review of editorials published on this topic in academic journals since 2010 by searching five databases up to December 2022. Thirty-eight (38) articles met the selection criteria. Nineteen (19) expressed a positive attitude, and Nineteen (19) expressed a negative or cautious attitude. Based on the results, the research period (2010–2022) was divided into three stages: 2010–2015, 2016–2018, and 2019–2022. Attitudes in the first stage were positive, the middle was at almost a tie, and the last retreated to negative. The most common concerns cited regarding SoMe use by HCPs are negative effects on physician–patient relationships, HCPs’ professional image, patient privacy, the quality of the information provided, conflict of interest declarations, ethical and legal risks, the perception of medical consensus, limited resources, and competing with entertainment. The editorial opinions of HCPs towards professional SoMe use express shifting hesitancies. The earlier optimism succeeded in an era (pre-2010) of cautioning against engaging with SoMe. Concerns
  • Otros:

    Autor según el artículo: Alhafez, Lina; Rubio-Rico, Lourdes; Diez-Bosch, Miriam
    Departamento: Infermeria
    Autor/es de la URV: Alhafez, Lina / Rubio Rico, Maria Lourdes
    Palabras clave: Good health and well-being
    Resumen: The increasing infodemic, changes in the media landscape, and the COVID-19 pandemic have rendered healthcare professionals’ involvement in social media (SoMe) of urgent need. However, research efforts to understand the opinions, needs, and concerns of healthcare professionals (HCP) tackling this new responsibility have been limited, despite being necessary for designing efficient support for them. In this article we look at varying opinions and attitudes published by HCPs towards the use of SoMe as a tool to communicate health-related information to the public: How did their attitudes develop since the decade preceding the COVID-19 outbreak and what were their main expressed concerns over the years. We conducted a qualitative review of editorials published on this topic in academic journals since 2010 by searching five databases up to December 2022. Thirty-eight (38) articles met the selection criteria. Nineteen (19) expressed a positive attitude, and Nineteen (19) expressed a negative or cautious attitude. Based on the results, the research period (2010–2022) was divided into three stages: 2010–2015, 2016–2018, and 2019–2022. Attitudes in the first stage were positive, the middle was at almost a tie, and the last retreated to negative. The most common concerns cited regarding SoMe use by HCPs are negative effects on physician–patient relationships, HCPs’ professional image, patient privacy, the quality of the information provided, conflict of interest declarations, ethical and legal risks, the perception of medical consensus, limited resources, and competing with entertainment. The editorial opinions of HCPs towards professional SoMe use express shifting hesitancies. The earlier optimism succeeded in an era (pre-2010) of cautioning against engaging with SoMe. Concerns in the first stage were mainly related to HCP´s behavior and use of SoMe. The last phase’s concerns were more oriented toward SoMe platforms, their design, dynamics, and effect on public discourse, with the escalating infodemic and COVID-19 pandemic.
    Áreas temáticas: Social sciences, interdisciplinary Social sciences (miscellaneous) Social sciences (all) Psychology (miscellaneous) Psychology (all) Humanities, multidisciplinary Economics, econometrics and finance (miscellaneous) Economics, econometrics and finance (all) Business, management and accounting (miscellaneous) Business, management and accounting (all) Arts and humanities (miscellaneous) Arts and humanities (all)
    Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Direcció de correo del autor: lina.alhafez@estudiants.urv.cat lourdes.rubio@urv.cat lourdes.rubio@urv.cat
    Identificador del autor: 0000-0002-3862-0462 0000-0002-3862-0462
    Fecha de alta del registro: 2024-11-23
    Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. 10 (1): 343-
    Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Alhafez, Lina; Rubio-Rico, Lourdes; Diez-Bosch, Miriam (2023). Healthcare professionals’ editorial opinions on communicating with the public: shifting social media hesitancies. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 343-. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01820-w
    Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Año de publicación de la revista: 2023
    Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
  • Palabras clave:

    Arts and Humanities (Miscellaneous),Business, Management and Accounting (Miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (Miscellaneous),Humanities, Multidisciplinary,Psychology (Miscellaneous),Social Sciences (Miscellaneous),Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
    Good health and well-being
    Social sciences, interdisciplinary
    Social sciences (miscellaneous)
    Social sciences (all)
    Psychology (miscellaneous)
    Psychology (all)
    Humanities, multidisciplinary
    Economics, econometrics and finance (miscellaneous)
    Economics, econometrics and finance (all)
    Business, management and accounting (miscellaneous)
    Business, management and accounting (all)
    Arts and humanities (miscellaneous)
    Arts and humanities (all)
  • Documentos:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar