Articles producció científica> Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques

Multi-institutional generalizability of a plan complexity machine learning model for predicting pre-treatment quality assurance results in radiotherapy.

  • Datos identificativos

    Identificador: imarina:9370829
    Autores:
    Claessens MDe Kerf GVanreusel VMollaert IHernandez VSaez JJornet NVerellen D
    Resumen:
    Background and purposeTreatment plans in radiotherapy are subject to measurement-based pre-treatment verifications. In this study, plan complexity metrics (PCMs) were calculated per beam and used as input features to develop a predictive model. The aim of this study was to determine the robustness against differences in machine type and institutional-specific quality assurance (QA).Material and methodsA number of 567 beams were collected, where 477 passed and 90 failed the pre-treatment QA. Treatment plans of different anatomical regions were included. One type of linear accelerator was represented. For all beams, 16 PCMs were calculated. A random forest classifier was trained to distinct between acceptable and non-acceptable beams. The model was validated on other datasets to investigate its robustness. Firstly, plans for another machine type from the same institution were evaluated. Secondly, an inter-institutional validation was conducted on three datasets from different centres with their associated QA.ResultsIntra-institutionally, the PCMs beam modulation, mean MLC gap, Q1 gap, and Modulation Complexity Score were the most informative to detect failing beams. Eighty-tree percent of the failed beams (15/18) were detected correctly. The model could not detect over-modulated beams of another machine type. Inter-institutionally, the model performance reached higher accuracy for centres with comparable equipment both for treatment and QA as the local institute.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates that the robustness decreases when major differences appear in the QA platform or in planning strategies, but that it is feasible to extrapolate institutional-specific trained models between centres with similar clinical practice. Predictive models should be developed for each mac
  • Otros:

    Autor según el artículo: Claessens M; De Kerf G; Vanreusel V; Mollaert I; Hernandez V; Saez J; Jornet N; Verellen D
    Departamento: Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques
    Autor/es de la URV: Hernandez Masgrau, Victor
    Palabras clave: Machine learning Multi-institutional validation Plan complexity Quality assurance Radiation therapy Vmat
    Resumen: Background and purposeTreatment plans in radiotherapy are subject to measurement-based pre-treatment verifications. In this study, plan complexity metrics (PCMs) were calculated per beam and used as input features to develop a predictive model. The aim of this study was to determine the robustness against differences in machine type and institutional-specific quality assurance (QA).Material and methodsA number of 567 beams were collected, where 477 passed and 90 failed the pre-treatment QA. Treatment plans of different anatomical regions were included. One type of linear accelerator was represented. For all beams, 16 PCMs were calculated. A random forest classifier was trained to distinct between acceptable and non-acceptable beams. The model was validated on other datasets to investigate its robustness. Firstly, plans for another machine type from the same institution were evaluated. Secondly, an inter-institutional validation was conducted on three datasets from different centres with their associated QA.ResultsIntra-institutionally, the PCMs beam modulation, mean MLC gap, Q1 gap, and Modulation Complexity Score were the most informative to detect failing beams. Eighty-tree percent of the failed beams (15/18) were detected correctly. The model could not detect over-modulated beams of another machine type. Inter-institutionally, the model performance reached higher accuracy for centres with comparable equipment both for treatment and QA as the local institute.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates that the robustness decreases when major differences appear in the QA platform or in planning strategies, but that it is feasible to extrapolate institutional-specific trained models between centres with similar clinical practice. Predictive models should be developed for each machine type.
    Áreas temáticas: Oncology Radiation Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging Radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging
    Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Direcció de correo del autor: victor.hernandez@urv.cat
    Identificador del autor: 0000-0003-3770-8486
    Fecha de alta del registro: 2024-06-22
    Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Enlace a la fuente original: https://www.phiro.science/article/S2405-6316(23)00116-1/fulltext
    Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: Physics And Imaging In Radiation Oncology. 29 100525-100525
    Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Claessens M; De Kerf G; Vanreusel V; Mollaert I; Hernandez V; Saez J; Jornet N; Verellen D (2024). Multi-institutional generalizability of a plan complexity machine learning model for predicting pre-treatment quality assurance results in radiotherapy.. Physics And Imaging In Radiation Oncology, 29(), 100525-100525. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100525
    URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    DOI del artículo: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100525
    Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Año de publicación de la revista: 2024
    Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
  • Palabras clave:

    Oncology,Radiation,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
    Machine learning
    Multi-institutional validation
    Plan complexity
    Quality assurance
    Radiation therapy
    Vmat
    Oncology
    Radiation
    Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
    Radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging
  • Documentos:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar