Measurement uncertainty in analytical methods in which trueness is assessed from recovery assays

Identificador:  imarina:6384503

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina6384503

Autors:  Maroto, A; Boqué, R; Riu, J; Rius, FX

Resum:
We propose a new procedure for estimating the uncertainty in quantitative routine analysis. This procedure uses the information generated when the trueness of the analytical method is assessed from recovery assays. In this paper, we assess trueness by estimating proportional bias (in terms of recovery) and constant bias separately. The advantage of the procedure is that little extra work needs to be done to estimate the measurement uncertainty associated to routine samples. This uncertainty is considered to be correct whenever the samples used in the recovery assays are representative of the future routine samples (in terms of matrix and analyte concentration). Moreover, these samples should be analysed by varying all the factors that can affect the analytical method. If they are analysed in this fashion, the precision estimates generated in the recovery assays take into account the variability of the routine samples and also all the sources of variability of the analytical method. Other terms related to the sample heterogeneity, sample pretreatments or factors not representatively varied in the recovery assays should only be subsequently included when necessary. The ideas presented are applied to calculate the uncertainty of results obtained when analysing sulphides in wine by HS-SPME-GC. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.