Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

Basic critical care echocardiography training of intensivists allows reproducible and reliable measurements of cardiac output

  • Dades identificatives

    Identificador: imarina:6389682
    Autors:
    Villavicencio CLeache JMarin JOliva IRodriguez ABodí MSoni NJ
    Resum:
    © The Author(s) 2019. Background: Although pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) have been the reference standard for calculating cardiac output, echocardiographic estimation of cardiac output (CO) by cardiologists has shown high accuracy compared to PAC measurements. A few studies have assessed the accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of CO in critically ill patients by intensivists with basic training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CO measurements by intensivists with basic training using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound vs. PACs in critically ill patients. Methods: Critically ill patients who required hemodynamic monitoring with a PAC were eligible for the study. Three different intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training obtained three measurements of CO on each patient. The maximum of three separate left-ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements and the mean of three LVOT velocity time integral measurements were used. The inter-observer reliability and correlation of CO measured by PACs vs. critical care echocardiography were assessed. Results: A total of 20 patients were included. Data were analyzed comparing the measurements of CO by PAC vs. echocardiography. The inter-observer reliability for measuring CO by echocardiography was good based on a coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.6 (95% CI 0.48–0.86, p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement between the two techniques were acceptable (0.64 ± 1.18 L/min, 95% limits of agreement of − 1.73 to 3.01 L/min). In patients with CO < 6.5 L/min, the agreement between CO measured by PAC vs. echocardiography improved (0.13 ± 0.89 L/min; 95% limits of agreement of − 1.64 to 2.22 L/min). The mean percentage of error between the two methods was 17%. Conclusions: Critical car
  • Altres:

    Autor segons l'article: Villavicencio C; Leache J; Marin J; Oliva I; Rodriguez A; Bodí M; Soni NJ
    Departament: Medicina i Cirurgia
    Autor/s de la URV: Bodi Saera, Maria Amparo
    Paraules clau: Pulsed-wave doppler Pulmonary artery catheter Critical care echocardiography Cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter critical care echocardiography cardiac output
    Resum: © The Author(s) 2019. Background: Although pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) have been the reference standard for calculating cardiac output, echocardiographic estimation of cardiac output (CO) by cardiologists has shown high accuracy compared to PAC measurements. A few studies have assessed the accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of CO in critically ill patients by intensivists with basic training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CO measurements by intensivists with basic training using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound vs. PACs in critically ill patients. Methods: Critically ill patients who required hemodynamic monitoring with a PAC were eligible for the study. Three different intensivists with basic critical care echocardiography training obtained three measurements of CO on each patient. The maximum of three separate left-ventricular outflow tract diameter measurements and the mean of three LVOT velocity time integral measurements were used. The inter-observer reliability and correlation of CO measured by PACs vs. critical care echocardiography were assessed. Results: A total of 20 patients were included. Data were analyzed comparing the measurements of CO by PAC vs. echocardiography. The inter-observer reliability for measuring CO by echocardiography was good based on a coefficient of intraclass correlation of 0.6 (95% CI 0.48–0.86, p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement between the two techniques were acceptable (0.64 ± 1.18 L/min, 95% limits of agreement of − 1.73 to 3.01 L/min). In patients with CO < 6.5 L/min, the agreement between CO measured by PAC vs. echocardiography improved (0.13 ± 0.89 L/min; 95% limits of agreement of − 1.64 to 2.22 L/min). The mean percentage of error between the two methods was 17%. Conclusions: Critical care echocardiography performed at the bedside by intensivists with basic critical care echo-cardiography training is an accurate and reproducible technique to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.
    Àrees temàtiques: Radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging Radiological and ultrasound technology Interdisciplinar
    Accès a la llicència d'ús: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    ISSN: 20367902
    Adreça de correu electrònic de l'autor: mariaamparo.bodi@urv.cat mariaamparo.bodi@urv.cat
    Identificador de l'autor: 0000-0001-7652-8379 0000-0001-7652-8379
    Data d'alta del registre: 2023-03-11
    Versió de l'article dipositat: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Referència a l'article segons font original: Critical Ultrasound Journal. 11 (1): 5-
    Referència de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Villavicencio C; Leache J; Marin J; Oliva I; Rodriguez A; Bodí M; Soni NJ (2019). Basic critical care echocardiography training of intensivists allows reproducible and reliable measurements of cardiac output. Critical Ultrasound Journal, 11(1), 5-. DOI: 10.1186/s13089-019-0120-0
    URL Document de llicència: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Entitat: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Any de publicació de la revista: 2019
    Tipus de publicació: Journal Publications
  • Paraules clau:

    Radiological and Ultrasound Technology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
    Pulsed-wave doppler
    Pulmonary artery catheter
    Critical care echocardiography
    Cardiac output
    pulmonary artery catheter
    critical care echocardiography
    cardiac output
    Radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging
    Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
    Radiological and ultrasound technology
    Interdisciplinar
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar