Ten-year follow-up of clinical governance implementation in primary care: Improving screening

Identificador:  imarina:6389697

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina6389697

Autors:  Aguilar Martin, Carina; Queiroga Goncalves, Alessandra; Lopez-Pablo, Carlos; Fernandez-Saez, Jose; Forcadell Drago, Emma; Hernandez Rojas, Zojaina; Pepio Vilaubi, Josep Maria; Rodriguez Cumplido, Dolores; Lluis Pinol, Josep; Blade-Creixenti, Jordi; Dalmau Llorca, Maria Rosa

Resum:
© 2019 by the authors. protective effect of having a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–0.94) or death (HR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35–0.88) was observed in patients from centres where general practitioners received high frequency feedback. Additionally, these PCCs presented improved cardiovascular health indicators and lower incidence and mortality by CVD, illustrating the impact of this intervention.Current improvement strategies for the control of cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) in Europe are based on quality management policies. With the aim of understanding the effect of interventions delivered by primary healthcare systems, we evaluated the impact of clinical governance on cardiovascular health after ten years of implementation in Catalonia. A cohort study that included 1878 patients was conducted in 19 primary care centres (PCCs). Audits that comprised 13 cardiovascular health indicators were performed and general practitioners received periodic (annual, biannual or monthly) feedback about their clinical practice. We evaluated improvement in screening, diagnosis and control of the main CRFs and the effects of the feedback on cardiovascular risk (CR), incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality, comparing baseline data with data at the end of the study (after a 10-year follow-up). The impact of the intervention was assessed globally and with respect to feedback frequency. General improvement was observed in screening, percentage of diagnoses and control of CRFs. At the end of the study, few clinically significant differences in CRFs were observed between groups. However, the reduction in CR was greater in the group receiving high frequency feedback, specifically in relation to smoking and control of diabetes and cholesterol (Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)). A.