Articles producció científica> Infermeria

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

  • Dades identificatives

    Identificador: imarina:9241753
  • Autors:

    Yi, Li-Juan
    Tian, Xu
    Chen, Min
    Lei, Jin-Mei
    Xiao, Na
    Jimenez-Herrera, Maria F.
  • Altres:

    Autor segons l'article: Yi, Li-Juan; Tian, Xu; Chen, Min; Lei, Jin-Mei; Xiao, Na; Jimenez-Herrera, Maria F.;
    Departament: Infermeria
    Autor/s de la URV: Jiménez Herrera, María Francisca / Tian, Xu
    Paraules clau: Weaning Ventilator weaning T-piece Systematic review Spontaneous breathing trials Software Review Respiratory comfort Randomized controlled trial (topic) Pressure support ventilation Positive airway pressure Pattern Outcome assessment Network meta-analysis Mortality Meta-analysis Meta analysis Medline Mechanical ventilation Male Length of stay Intensive-care-unit Intensive care unit Inconsistency Human Female Extubation failure Extubation Emergency care Embase Drug safety Critically ill patient Continuous positive airway pressure Compensation Comparative effectiveness Cochrane library Automatic tube compensation Adult Additional work
    Resum: Background: Spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) has been used to predict the optimal time of weaning from ventilator. However, it remains controversial which trial should be preferentially selected. We aimed to compare and rank four common SBT modes including automatic tube compensation (ATC), pressure support ventilation (PSV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and T-piece among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV).Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify studies that investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of at least two SBT strategies among critically ill patients up to May 17, 2020. We estimated the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank SBT techniques, and determined the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Primary outcome was weaning success. Secondary outcomes were reintubation, SBT success, duration of acute care, and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4, Stata, and R software.Results: We enrolled 24 trials finally. Extubation success rate was significantly higher in ATC than that in T-piece (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.64) or PSV (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88). For SBT success, ATC was better than other SBT techniques, with a pooled OR ranging from 0.17 to 0.42. For reintubation rate, CPAP was worse than T-piece (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.08 to 7.06). No significant difference was detected between SBT modes for the length of stay in ICU or long-term weaning unit (LWU). Similar result was also found for ICU mortality between PSV and T-piece. Majority direct results were confirmed by network meta-analysis. Besides, ATC ranks at the first, first, and fourth place with a SUCRA of 91.7, 99.7, and 39.9%, respectively in increasing weaning success and SBT success and in prolonging ICU or LWU length of stay among four SBT strategies. The confidences in evidences were rated as low for most comparisons.Conclusion: ATC seems to be the optimal choice of predicting successful weaning from ventilator among critically ill patients. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high quality are needed to further establish these findings.
    Àrees temàtiques: Oncology Medicine, research & experimental Medicine, general & internal Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicine (all) Medicina ii General medicine Farmacia Ciências biológicas i Biodiversidade
    Accès a la llicència d'ús: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Adreça de correu electrònic de l'autor: maria.jimenez@urv.cat xu.tian@estudiants.urv.cat
    Identificador de l'autor: 0000-0003-2599-3742
    Data d'alta del registre: 2024-06-22
    Versió de l'article dipositat: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Enllaç font original: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.731196/full
    URL Document de llicència: http://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Referència a l'article segons font original: Frontiers Of Medicine. 8 731196-
    Referència de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Yi, Li-Juan; Tian, Xu; Chen, Min; Lei, Jin-Mei; Xiao, Na; Jimenez-Herrera, Maria F.; (2021). Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Spontaneous Breathing Trials for Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Frontiers Of Medicine, 8(), 731196-. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731196
    DOI de l'article: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731196
    Entitat: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Any de publicació de la revista: 2021
    Tipus de publicació: Journal Publications
  • Paraules clau:

    Medicine (Miscellaneous),Medicine, General & Internal,Medicine, Research & Experimental,Oncology
    Weaning
    Ventilator weaning
    T-piece
    Systematic review
    Spontaneous breathing trials
    Software
    Review
    Respiratory comfort
    Randomized controlled trial (topic)
    Pressure support ventilation
    Positive airway pressure
    Pattern
    Outcome assessment
    Network meta-analysis
    Mortality
    Meta-analysis
    Meta analysis
    Medline
    Mechanical ventilation
    Male
    Length of stay
    Intensive-care-unit
    Intensive care unit
    Inconsistency
    Human
    Female
    Extubation failure
    Extubation
    Emergency care
    Embase
    Drug safety
    Critically ill patient
    Continuous positive airway pressure
    Compensation
    Comparative effectiveness
    Cochrane library
    Automatic tube compensation
    Adult
    Additional work
    Oncology
    Medicine, research & experimental
    Medicine, general & internal
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    Medicine (all)
    Medicina ii
    General medicine
    Farmacia
    Ciências biológicas i
    Biodiversidade
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar