Repositori URV

Identificador: imarina:9386589

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina9386589

Autors:
Joanpere, MarPuigvert-Mallart, LidiaValls-Carol, RosaMelgar, PatriciaAlvarez-Guerrero, GaraziFlecha, Ramon

Resum:
The scientific literature has shown an increasing demand by citizens and society at large to stop using people who have committed sexual violence against children as a reference in academia. However, research has not explored the fact that in some sectors of society, the rejection of individuals who have exercised sexual abuse against children is entirely deliberate. This study analyzes, for the first time, the incoherence of many academics when it comes to their positioning regarding different renowned authors who commit sexual abuse against children, and the consequences of such incoherence according to several citizens. To that end, social media analytics and interviews with 16 individuals aged 27 to 70 years from different professions, including university professors, construction workers and retired lawyers, were conducted. The results show three main consequences of the incoherence of academics who use as a reference authors who have defended and exercised pederasty: promoting social mistrust toward those academics, as there is no coherence between what they say and do; normalizing and promoting pederasty and impunity toward abusers, creating a sense that "anything goes"; and silencing and revictimizing victims, which creates a context of great vulnerability to develop a healthy sexuality.