Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

Validation Of Cancer Diagnoses In Electronic Health Records: Results From The Information System For Research In Primary Care (SIDIAP) In Northeast Spain

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:6139029
    Authors:
    Recalde, MartinaManzano-Salgado, Cyntia B.Diaz, YesikaPuente, DianaDel Mar Garcia-Gil, MariaMarcos-Gragera, RafaelRibes-Puig, JosefaGalceran, JaumePosso, MargaritaMacia, FrancescDuarte-Salles, Talita
    Abstract:
    Background: Electronic health records are becoming an increasingly valuable resource for epidemiology but their data quality needs to be quantified. We aimed to validate twenty-five types of incident cancer cases in the Information System for Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) in Catalonia with the population-based cancer registries of Girona and Tarragona as the gold-standard. Methods: We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive values (PPV), and the timedifference between the date of diagnosis entered into the SIDIAP and into the registries. We added hospital discharge cancer diagnoses to the SIDIAP to assess sensitivity changes. Results: We identified 27,046 incident cancer diagnoses in the SIDIAP from 2009-2015 among the 949,841 residents of Girona and Tarragona. The cancer types with the highest sensitivity were breast (89%, 95% CI: 88-90%), colorectal (81%, 95% CI: 80-82%), and prostate (81%, 95% CI: 80-83%). Trachea, bronchus and lung cancers had the highest PPV (76%, 95% CI: 74%-78%) followed by stomach (72%, 95% CI: 68-75%) and pancreas (71%, 95% CI: 67-75%). Most cancer diagnoses were reported with less than three months of difference between the SIDIAP and the registries. More cases were registered first in the registries than in the SIDIAP. By adding cancer diagnoses based on hospital discharge data, sensitivity increased for all cancers, especially for gallbladder and biliary tract for which the sensitivity increased by 21%. Conclusion: The SIDIAP includes 76% of the cancer diagnoses in the cancer registries but includes a considerable number of cases that are not in the registries. The SIDIAP reports most of the cancer diagnoses within a three-month period difference from the date of diagnosis in the cancer registries. Our results support the use of
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Recalde, Martina; Manzano-Salgado, Cyntia B.; Diaz, Yesika; Puente, Diana; Del Mar Garcia-Gil, Maria; Marcos-Gragera, Rafael; Ribes-Puig, Josefa; Galceran, Jaume; Posso, Margarita; Macia, Francesc; Duarte-Salles, Talita;
    Department: Medicina i Cirurgia
    URV's Author/s: Galceran Padrós, Jaume Josep Maria
    Keywords: Validation studies Primary health care Population-based cancer registries Electronic health records Cancer
    Abstract: Background: Electronic health records are becoming an increasingly valuable resource for epidemiology but their data quality needs to be quantified. We aimed to validate twenty-five types of incident cancer cases in the Information System for Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) in Catalonia with the population-based cancer registries of Girona and Tarragona as the gold-standard. Methods: We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive values (PPV), and the timedifference between the date of diagnosis entered into the SIDIAP and into the registries. We added hospital discharge cancer diagnoses to the SIDIAP to assess sensitivity changes. Results: We identified 27,046 incident cancer diagnoses in the SIDIAP from 2009-2015 among the 949,841 residents of Girona and Tarragona. The cancer types with the highest sensitivity were breast (89%, 95% CI: 88-90%), colorectal (81%, 95% CI: 80-82%), and prostate (81%, 95% CI: 80-83%). Trachea, bronchus and lung cancers had the highest PPV (76%, 95% CI: 74%-78%) followed by stomach (72%, 95% CI: 68-75%) and pancreas (71%, 95% CI: 67-75%). Most cancer diagnoses were reported with less than three months of difference between the SIDIAP and the registries. More cases were registered first in the registries than in the SIDIAP. By adding cancer diagnoses based on hospital discharge data, sensitivity increased for all cancers, especially for gallbladder and biliary tract for which the sensitivity increased by 21%. Conclusion: The SIDIAP includes 76% of the cancer diagnoses in the cancer registries but includes a considerable number of cases that are not in the registries. The SIDIAP reports most of the cancer diagnoses within a three-month period difference from the date of diagnosis in the cancer registries. Our results support the use of the SIDIAP cancer diagnoses for epidemiological research when cancer is the outcome of interest. We recommend adding hospital discharge data to the SIDIAP to increase data quality, particularly for less frequent cancer types.
    Thematic Areas: Public, environmental & occupational health Epidemiology
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    ISSN: 11791349
    Author's mail: jaumejosepmaria.galceran@urv.cat
    Record's date: 2023-03-06
    Papper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Papper original source: Clinical Epidemiology. 11 1015-1024
    APA: Recalde, Martina; Manzano-Salgado, Cyntia B.; Diaz, Yesika; Puente, Diana; Del Mar Garcia-Gil, Maria; Marcos-Gragera, Rafael; Ribes-Puig, Josefa; Galc (2019). Validation Of Cancer Diagnoses In Electronic Health Records: Results From The Information System For Research In Primary Care (SIDIAP) In Northeast Spain. Clinical Epidemiology, 11(), 1015-1024. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S225568
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2019
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Epidemiology,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    Validation studies
    Primary health care
    Population-based cancer registries
    Electronic health records
    Cancer
    Public, environmental & occupational health
    Epidemiology
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar