Articles producció científicaGestió d'Empreses

The influence of ethical judgements on acceptance and non-acceptance of wearables and insideables: Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

  • Identification data

    Identifier:  imarina:9229543
    Authors:  de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge; Arias-Oliva, Mario; Pelegrin-Borondo, Jorge; Mohammad Almahameed, Ala' Ali
    Abstract:
    The rise of intelligent technological devices (ITDs)-wearables and insideables-provides the possibility of enhancing human capabilities and skills. This study contributes to the literature on the impact of ethical judgements on the acceptance of ITDs by using a multidimensional ethical scale (MES) proposed by Shwayer and Sennetti. The novelty of this study resides in using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) instead of correlational methods to explain human behaviour (in this case, attitudes towards ITDs) from an ethical perspective. fsQCA evaluates the influence of ethical variables on the intention to use ITDs (and the non-use of these technologies). Positive ethical evaluations of technology do not always ensure ITD acceptance-unfavourable ethical perceptions may lead to its rejection. We find that for wearables: (1) positive perceptions from a utilitarian perspective are key in explaining their acceptance. Likewise, we identify configurations leading to acceptance where positive judgements on moral equity, egoism and contractualism are needed. Surprisingly, only the relativism dimension participates in configurations that cause acceptance when it is negated; (2) We found that a single unfavourable perception from a contractualism or relativism perspective causes non-use. Likewise, we found that coupling of negative judgements on moral equity, utilitarianism and egoism dimensions also produce resistance to wearables. For insideables, we notice that: (1) an MES has weak explanatory power for the intention to use ITDs but is effective in understanding resistance to use; (2) A negative perception of any ethical dimension leads to resistance towards insideables.
  • Others:

    Link to the original source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21001640?via%3Dihub
    APA: de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge; Arias-Oliva, Mario; Pelegrin-Borondo, Jorge; Mohammad Almahameed, Ala' Ali (2021). The influence of ethical judgements on acceptance and non-acceptance of wearables and insideables: Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Technology In Society, 67(), 101689-. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101689
    Paper original source: Technology In Society. 67 101689-
    Article's DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101689
    Journal publication year: 2021
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Paper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Record's date: 2025-02-19
    URV's Author/s: Arias Oliva, Mario / De Andrés Sánchez, Jorge
    Department: Gestió d'Empreses
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
    Author, as appears in the article.: de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge; Arias-Oliva, Mario; Pelegrin-Borondo, Jorge; Mohammad Almahameed, Ala' Ali
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Thematic Areas: Administração pública e de empresas, ciências contábeis e turismo, Business and international management, Ciência política e relações internacionais, Ciencias sociales, Education, Engenharias iii, Human factors and ergonomics, Social issues, Social sciences, interdisciplinary, Sociology and political science
    Author's mail: jorge.deandres@urv.cat, mario.arias@urv.cat
  • Keywords:

    Advanced technology
    Behavioral research
    Comparative study
    Correlation
    Cyborg
    Decision
    Ethical judgements
    Ethical perspectives
    Ethics
    Explanatory power
    Fuzzy mathematics
    Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
    Fuzzy sets
    Human behavior
    Human behaviours
    Human capability
    Intelligent technological devices
    Intention to non-use
    Intention to use
    Multidimensional ethical scale
    Philosophical aspects
    Qualitative analysis
    Qualitative comparative analysis
    Relativity
    Scale
    Technology
    Wearable technology
    Business and International Management
    Education
    Human Factors and Ergonomics
    Social Issues
    Social Sciences
    Interdisciplinary
    Sociology and Political Science
    Administração pública e de empresas
    ciências contábeis e turismo
    Ciência política e relações internacionais
    Ciencias sociales
    Engenharias iii
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar