Articles producció científica> Geografia

How different are objective operationalizations of walkability for older adults compared to the general population? A systematic review

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:9280624
    Authors:
    Akinci ZSDelclòs-Alió XVich GSalvo DIbarluzea JMiralles-Guasch C
    Abstract:
    Walking is an essential activity for everyone and for older adults in particular, given that it is the most accessible form of physical activity and one of the healthiest transportation modes. Understanding how walkability (the potential of the environment to enable and/or encourage walking) has been objectively measured and analyzed for older adults is critical to create more inclusive, healthy, and sustainable environments and to promote healthy aging. Despite the numerous reviews on physical activity among older adults and its relationship with the built environment, the literature still lacks comparison reviews focusing specifically on objective operationalizations of walkability for older adults vs. the general population.We conducted a systematic review of 146 empirical studies that measured walkability objectively in relation to walking-related outcomes. We compared studies focused on older adults (n = 24) and the general population (n = 122). Content analysis included the characteristics of the study design, walkability measures, spatial extent, and associations found between walkability and walking-related outcomes.In both groups of publications, the majority of studies were conducted in the US, Canada, and Europe, and largely in high-income countries. They were mostly published in health-related journals and used cross-sectional designs, operationalized walkability by using indexes, employed self-reported measures for walking-related outcomes, and found positive associations between walkability and walking outcomes. However, we observed some differences among studies focusing on older adults. Compared to studies focusing on the general population, a larger proportion of studies on older adults was conducted in the Middle East and Asia, and they used longitudin
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Akinci ZS; Delclòs-Alió X; Vich G; Salvo D; Ibarluzea J; Miralles-Guasch C
    Department: Geografia
    URV's Author/s: Delclòs Alió, Xavier
    Keywords: Walking Walkability Systematic literature review Physical activity Older adults Neighborhood built environment Built environment walking walk score(r) utilitarian walking urban design systematic literature review socioeconomic-status randomized controlled-trial psychosocial factors moderate physical activity older adults measured physical-activity built environment associations active-transport
    Abstract: Walking is an essential activity for everyone and for older adults in particular, given that it is the most accessible form of physical activity and one of the healthiest transportation modes. Understanding how walkability (the potential of the environment to enable and/or encourage walking) has been objectively measured and analyzed for older adults is critical to create more inclusive, healthy, and sustainable environments and to promote healthy aging. Despite the numerous reviews on physical activity among older adults and its relationship with the built environment, the literature still lacks comparison reviews focusing specifically on objective operationalizations of walkability for older adults vs. the general population.We conducted a systematic review of 146 empirical studies that measured walkability objectively in relation to walking-related outcomes. We compared studies focused on older adults (n = 24) and the general population (n = 122). Content analysis included the characteristics of the study design, walkability measures, spatial extent, and associations found between walkability and walking-related outcomes.In both groups of publications, the majority of studies were conducted in the US, Canada, and Europe, and largely in high-income countries. They were mostly published in health-related journals and used cross-sectional designs, operationalized walkability by using indexes, employed self-reported measures for walking-related outcomes, and found positive associations between walkability and walking outcomes. However, we observed some differences among studies focusing on older adults. Compared to studies focusing on the general population, a larger proportion of studies on older adults was conducted in the Middle East and Asia, and they used longitudinal designs, mixed methods to measure walking-related outcomes, variables related with land-use characteristics, safety from traffic and crime, and greenery, and a larger proportion found positive, as well as no associations between walkability and walking-related outcomes.Although there is a promising increase in interest in older adults-focused walkability studies in the last decade, there is still a need for more studies focusing on different settings, using wider spatial extents, longitudinal designs, objective or mixed methods to collect outcome data, and specific variables and/or specially created indexes for older adults and for settings.© 2022. The Author(s).
    Thematic Areas: Sociologia i política Saúde coletiva Odontología Medicina ii Medicina i Interdisciplinar Gerontology Geriatrics and gerontology Geriatrics & gerontology General o multidisciplinar Engenharias iv Enfermagem Educação física Educação Ciencias sociales Ciências biológicas ii Ciências biológicas i
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Author's mail: xavier.delclos@urv.cat
    Record's date: 2024-07-27
    Papper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Link to the original source: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12877-022-03233-x
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Papper original source: Bmc Geriatrics. 22 (1): 673-673
    APA: Akinci ZS; Delclòs-Alió X; Vich G; Salvo D; Ibarluzea J; Miralles-Guasch C (2022). How different are objective operationalizations of walkability for older adults compared to the general population? A systematic review. Bmc Geriatrics, 22(1), 673-673. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03233-x
    Article's DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03233-x
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2022
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Geriatrics & Gerontology,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology
    Walking
    Walkability
    Systematic literature review
    Physical activity
    Older adults
    Neighborhood built environment
    Built environment
    walking
    walk score(r)
    utilitarian walking
    urban design
    systematic literature review
    socioeconomic-status
    randomized controlled-trial
    psychosocial factors moderate
    physical activity
    older adults
    measured physical-activity
    built environment
    associations
    active-transport
    Sociologia i política
    Saúde coletiva
    Odontología
    Medicina ii
    Medicina i
    Interdisciplinar
    Gerontology
    Geriatrics and gerontology
    Geriatrics & gerontology
    General o multidisciplinar
    Engenharias iv
    Enfermagem
    Educação física
    Educação
    Ciencias sociales
    Ciências biológicas ii
    Ciências biológicas i
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar