Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

The NDDG criteria versus the IADPSG or the ADA criteria for diagnosing early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus or abnormal glucose tolerance

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:9287162
    Authors:
    Luisa Gonzalez-Gonzalez, NievesGonzalez-Davila, EnriqueMegia, AnaPintado, PilarVega, BegonaPadron, ErikaPerez-Conde, LauraVillalba, NazaretBugatto, Fernando
    Abstract:
    Objective To analyze the effects of substituting the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria with the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) or American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for the diagnosis of early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (Early-GDM) or first trimester abnormal glucose tolerance (1 t-AGT). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 3200 women: 400 with Early-GDM, 800 with GDM, and 2000 with Non-GDM, according to the NDDG criteria. Rates of women with missed and new Early-GDM according to the IADPSG or ADA criteria were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare perinatal outcomes between groups. Results Using the IADPSG criteria, 61.6% of women with Early-GDM according to the NDDG were undiagnosed (Missed-Early-GDM group), and 25.9% of women with GDM and 15.7% of women with Non-GDM were diagnosed with Early-GDM (New-Early-GDM groups). Perinatal outcomes were worse in Missed-Early-GDM than in Non-GDM and better in New-Early-GDM groups than in the Early-GDM group. According to the ADA recommendations, only 11.8% of women with Early-GDM according to the NDDG criteria were diagnosed. Conclusion Replacing the NDDG recommendations for the diagnosis of Early-GDM with the IADPSG or ADA criteria would mean depriving a large number of women with AGT and higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes from early treatment and treating others with lower risk.
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Luisa Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Nieves; Gonzalez-Davila, Enrique; Megia, Ana; Pintado, Pilar; Vega, Begona; Padron, Erika; Perez-Conde, Laura; Villalba, Nazaret; Bugatto, Fernando;
    Department: Medicina i Cirurgia
    URV's Author/s: Megía Colet, Ana
    Keywords: Pregnancy National diabetes data group (nddg) International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups (iadpsg) Gestational diabetes First prenatal visit Early Diagnosis Classification Association American diabetes association (ada) Abnormal glucose tolerance
    Abstract: Objective To analyze the effects of substituting the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria with the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) or American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for the diagnosis of early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (Early-GDM) or first trimester abnormal glucose tolerance (1 t-AGT). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 3200 women: 400 with Early-GDM, 800 with GDM, and 2000 with Non-GDM, according to the NDDG criteria. Rates of women with missed and new Early-GDM according to the IADPSG or ADA criteria were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare perinatal outcomes between groups. Results Using the IADPSG criteria, 61.6% of women with Early-GDM according to the NDDG were undiagnosed (Missed-Early-GDM group), and 25.9% of women with GDM and 15.7% of women with Non-GDM were diagnosed with Early-GDM (New-Early-GDM groups). Perinatal outcomes were worse in Missed-Early-GDM than in Non-GDM and better in New-Early-GDM groups than in the Early-GDM group. According to the ADA recommendations, only 11.8% of women with Early-GDM according to the NDDG criteria were diagnosed. Conclusion Replacing the NDDG recommendations for the diagnosis of Early-GDM with the IADPSG or ADA criteria would mean depriving a large number of women with AGT and higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes from early treatment and treating others with lower risk.
    Thematic Areas: Saúde coletiva Psicología Planejamento urbano e regional / demografia Odontología Obstetrics and gynecology Obstetrics & gynecology Nutrição Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicina veterinaria Medicina iii Medicina ii Medicina i Interdisciplinar Geociências General medicine Farmacia Engenharias iv Engenharias i Enfermagem Economia Direito Ciências biológicas iii Ciências biológicas ii Ciências biológicas i Ciências ambientais Biotecnología
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Author's mail: ana.megia@urv.cat
    Author identifier: 0000-0002-5101-9452
    Record's date: 2024-08-03
    Papper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Link to the original source: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.14453
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Papper original source: International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 160 (3): 906-914
    APA: Luisa Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Nieves; Gonzalez-Davila, Enrique; Megia, Ana; Pintado, Pilar; Vega, Begona; Padron, Erika; Perez-Conde, Laura; Villalba, Naza (2023). The NDDG criteria versus the IADPSG or the ADA criteria for diagnosing early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus or abnormal glucose tolerance. International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 160(3), 906-914. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14453
    Article's DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14453
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2023
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Medicine (Miscellaneous),Obstetrics & Gynecology,Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Pregnancy
    National diabetes data group (nddg)
    International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups (iadpsg)
    Gestational diabetes
    First prenatal visit
    Early
    Diagnosis
    Classification
    Association
    American diabetes association (ada)
    Abnormal glucose tolerance
    Saúde coletiva
    Psicología
    Planejamento urbano e regional / demografia
    Odontología
    Obstetrics and gynecology
    Obstetrics & gynecology
    Nutrição
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    Medicina veterinaria
    Medicina iii
    Medicina ii
    Medicina i
    Interdisciplinar
    Geociências
    General medicine
    Farmacia
    Engenharias iv
    Engenharias i
    Enfermagem
    Economia
    Direito
    Ciências biológicas iii
    Ciências biológicas ii
    Ciências biológicas i
    Ciências ambientais
    Biotecnología
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar