Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:9334358
    Authors:
    Fiol-deRoque, MAValderas, JMde la Torre, JASerrano-Ripoll, MJGens-Barbera, MSánchez-Freire, EMartín-Luján, FMde Labry, AORicci-Cabello, I
    Abstract:
    Patients provide a unique, irreplaceable, and essential perspective in evaluating patient safety. The suite of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) tools are a notable exception to the scarcity of patient-reported patient safety measures. Full evaluation of their performance has only been attempted for the English version, thereby limiting its international applicability.To assess the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact.Cross-sectional validation study. We used Classical Test Theory methods to examine scale score distribution, internal consistency, and construct validity; and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to further explore construct validity.3287 patients completed the Spanish version, and 1007 the Catalan version. Similar results were obtained for both versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a single construct for each scale. The correlations between PREOS-PC-Compact scales and known group analysis suggested adequate construct validity (inconclusive for known groups at the provider level). All four multi-item scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (α > 0.7), which was only confirmed for test-retest reliability for 'Practice activation.' A sample between 60-90 patients per practice was estimated sufficient to produce scores with reliability > 0.7 for all scales except for harm scales. IRT models showed disordered thresholds for 'Practice activation' and 'Harm burden' but showed excellent fit after reducing the response categories.The Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact are broadly valid and reliable tools to measure patient safety in Spanish primary care centres; confirmation of lower-than-expected test-rest reliability merits
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Fiol-deRoque, MA; Valderas, JM; de la Torre, JA; Serrano-Ripoll, MJ; Gens-Barbera, M; Sánchez-Freire, E; Martín-Luján, FM; de Labry, AO; Ricci-Cabello, I
    Department: Medicina i Cirurgia
    URV's Author/s: Martín Lujan, Francisco Manuel
    Keywords: Primary-health-care Primary health care Patient safety Patient reported outcomes Observational study Health care evaluation mechanisms validation primary health care patient safety patient reported outcomes observational study
    Abstract: Patients provide a unique, irreplaceable, and essential perspective in evaluating patient safety. The suite of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) tools are a notable exception to the scarcity of patient-reported patient safety measures. Full evaluation of their performance has only been attempted for the English version, thereby limiting its international applicability.To assess the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact.Cross-sectional validation study. We used Classical Test Theory methods to examine scale score distribution, internal consistency, and construct validity; and Item Response Theory (IRT) methods to further explore construct validity.3287 patients completed the Spanish version, and 1007 the Catalan version. Similar results were obtained for both versions. Confirmatory Factor Analysis supported a single construct for each scale. The correlations between PREOS-PC-Compact scales and known group analysis suggested adequate construct validity (inconclusive for known groups at the provider level). All four multi-item scales demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (α > 0.7), which was only confirmed for test-retest reliability for 'Practice activation.' A sample between 60-90 patients per practice was estimated sufficient to produce scores with reliability > 0.7 for all scales except for harm scales. IRT models showed disordered thresholds for 'Practice activation' and 'Harm burden' but showed excellent fit after reducing the response categories.The Spanish and Catalan versions of the PREOS-PC-Compact are broadly valid and reliable tools to measure patient safety in Spanish primary care centres; confirmation of lower-than-expected test-rest reliability merits further examination .
    Thematic Areas: Primary health care Medicine, general & internal Medicine (miscellaneous) General medicine Family practice
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Author's mail: paco.martin@urv.cat
    Author identifier: 0000-0003-0359-3588
    Record's date: 2024-08-03
    Papper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Papper original source: European Journal Of General Practice. 30 (1): 2296573-2296573
    APA: Fiol-deRoque, MA; Valderas, JM; de la Torre, JA; Serrano-Ripoll, MJ; Gens-Barbera, M; Sánchez-Freire, E; Martín-Luján, FM; de Labry, AO; Ricci-Cabello (2024). Evaluation of the psychometric performance of the Spanish and Catalan versions of the patient reported experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC)-Compact questionnaire. European Journal Of General Practice, 30(1), 2296573-2296573. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2296573
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2024
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Family Practice,Medicine (Miscellaneous),Medicine, General & Internal,Primary Health Care
    Primary-health-care
    Primary health care
    Patient safety
    Patient reported outcomes
    Observational study
    Health care evaluation mechanisms
    validation
    primary health care
    patient safety
    patient reported outcomes
    observational study
    Primary health care
    Medicine, general & internal
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    General medicine
    Family practice
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar