Articles producció científica> Medicina i Cirurgia

Evaluating SinergiAPS, an intervention based on patient feedback to improve patient safety in primary care: a cluster randomized trial

  • Identification data

    Identifier: imarina:9452230
    Authors:
    Fiol-deRoque, Maria AntoniaValderas, Jose MariaSerrano-Ripoll, Maria JesusGens-Barbara, MontserratMartin-Lujan, FranciscoSanchez-Freire, EncarnaMontano, Juan JoseMira-Martinez, SofiaPastor-Moreno, GuadalupeZamanillo-Campos, RocioRiera-Serra, PauRicci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Abstract:
    Background Patient safety, defined by the WHO as the absence of preventable harm, is a critical component of healthcare quality and poses a significant challenge globally. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SinergiAPS, a patient-centred audit and feedback intervention, in improving patient safety in primary healthcare (PHC) centres. Methods We conducted a 12-month cluster randomized controlled, multicentre trial. Fifty-nine PHC centres (1053 PHC professionals) in Spain were recruited and randomly allocated (1:1) to usual care or SinergiAPS intervention. The SinergiAPS intervention comprised: a bespoke feedback report with results from audits of patient safety based on the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire, administered to 75 patients/centre; a set of educational materials, and a structured template to record safety improvement plans. The primary outcome (at the PHC professional level) was patient safety culture (Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) questionnaire). Secondary outcomes (at the centre level) were patient-reported safety (six PREOS-PC scales), and rate of avoidable hospital admissions. After a 12-month follow-up, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC professionals to explore their perceptions of the intervention. Results During the 12-month follow-up, 10 of the 30 centres in the intervention group held action plan team meetings and eight registered 57 safety improvement action plans. The plans aimed to improve patient activation, address treatment-related incidents, enhance communication between patients and providers, and strengthen patient safety culture. At 12 months, no significant differences were observed in MOSPSC mean score (intervention: 3.60
  • Others:

    Author, as appears in the article.: Fiol-deRoque, Maria Antonia; Valderas, Jose Maria; Serrano-Ripoll, Maria Jesus; Gens-Barbara, Montserrat; Martin-Lujan, Francisco; Sanchez-Freire, Encarna; Montano, Juan Jose; Mira-Martinez, Sofia; Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe; Zamanillo-Campos, Rocio; Riera-Serra, Pau; Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    Department: Medicina i Cirurgia
    URV's Author/s: Martín Lujan, Francisco Manuel
    Keywords: Adult Cultur Experiences Feedback Female Humans Male Middle aged Patient safety Primary health care Primary-health-care Quality improvement Randomized controlled tria Randomized controlled trial Spain Surveys and questionnaires Validation
    Abstract: Background Patient safety, defined by the WHO as the absence of preventable harm, is a critical component of healthcare quality and poses a significant challenge globally. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of SinergiAPS, a patient-centred audit and feedback intervention, in improving patient safety in primary healthcare (PHC) centres. Methods We conducted a 12-month cluster randomized controlled, multicentre trial. Fifty-nine PHC centres (1053 PHC professionals) in Spain were recruited and randomly allocated (1:1) to usual care or SinergiAPS intervention. The SinergiAPS intervention comprised: a bespoke feedback report with results from audits of patient safety based on the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire, administered to 75 patients/centre; a set of educational materials, and a structured template to record safety improvement plans. The primary outcome (at the PHC professional level) was patient safety culture (Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC) questionnaire). Secondary outcomes (at the centre level) were patient-reported safety (six PREOS-PC scales), and rate of avoidable hospital admissions. After a 12-month follow-up, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with PHC professionals to explore their perceptions of the intervention. Results During the 12-month follow-up, 10 of the 30 centres in the intervention group held action plan team meetings and eight registered 57 safety improvement action plans. The plans aimed to improve patient activation, address treatment-related incidents, enhance communication between patients and providers, and strengthen patient safety culture. At 12 months, no significant differences were observed in MOSPSC mean score (intervention: 3.60 [95% CI 3.55 to 3.64] vs. control: 3.64 [3.60 to 3.68]). Similarly, no differences were observed in the secondary outcomes, with both groups experiencing a decline in patient-reported safety and avoidable hospital admissions. The qualitative interviews evidenced that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic 6-9 weeks after initiating the follow-up period severely limited PHC's capacity of developing and implementing safety improvement action plans, despite high levels of acceptability and perceived utility of the SinergiAPS intervention. Conclusions In the context of the health emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, SinergiAPS did not improve patient safety in Spanish PHC centres.
    Thematic Areas: Ciências biológicas i Ciências biológicas ii Ciências biológicas iii General medicine Medicina i Medicina ii Medicina veterinaria Medicine (all) Medicine (miscellaneous) Medicine, general & internal Saúde coletiva
    licence for use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Author's mail: paco.martin@urv.cat
    Author identifier: 0000-0003-0359-3588
    Record's date: 2025-04-30
    Paper version: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    Paper original source: Bmc Medicine. 23 (1): 202-
    APA: Fiol-deRoque, Maria Antonia; Valderas, Jose Maria; Serrano-Ripoll, Maria Jesus; Gens-Barbara, Montserrat; Martin-Lujan, Francisco; Sanchez-Freire, Enc (2025). Evaluating SinergiAPS, an intervention based on patient feedback to improve patient safety in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Bmc Medicine, 23(1), 202-. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-04029-7
    Licence document URL: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Entity: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Journal publication year: 2025
    Publication Type: Journal Publications
  • Keywords:

    Medicine (Miscellaneous),Medicine, General & Internal
    Adult
    Cultur
    Experiences
    Feedback
    Female
    Humans
    Male
    Middle aged
    Patient safety
    Primary health care
    Primary-health-care
    Quality improvement
    Randomized controlled tria
    Randomized controlled trial
    Spain
    Surveys and questionnaires
    Validation
    Ciências biológicas i
    Ciências biológicas ii
    Ciências biológicas iii
    General medicine
    Medicina i
    Medicina ii
    Medicina veterinaria
    Medicine (all)
    Medicine (miscellaneous)
    Medicine, general & internal
    Saúde coletiva
  • Documents:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar