Evaluation of glycemic status and subclinical atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia subjects with or without LDL receptor mutation

Identifier:  imarina:9452309

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina9452309

Authors:  Barbagallo, FD; Bosco, G; Di Marco, M; Scilletta, S; Miano, N; Musmeci, M; Martedi, M; González-Lleó, AM; Ibarretxe, D; De Francesco, EM; Malaguarnera, R; Di Pino, A; Masana, L; Purrello, F; Piro, S; Scicali, R

Abstract:
Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition characterized by elevated LDL-C and increased cardiovascular risk. Beyond LDL-C levels, the impact of genotype on glucose homeostasis has not been well evaluated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of genotype on glycemic status and on atherosclerotic injury in FH subjects. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study on 322 FH subjects not on lipid-lowering therapy and without history of cardiovascular disease. Biochemical and genetic analyses as well as vascular profile assessment were obtained from all subjects. The study population was divided into two groups according to genotype: LDL receptor (LDLR) group and non-LDLR (NLDLR) group. Results The LDLR group exhibited a higher prevalence of low glycemic status (LGS) than the NLDLR group (44.1% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), whereas a high glycemic status (HGS) was more prevalent in the NLDLR group compared with LDLR group (74% vs. 55.9%, p < 0.01). The NLDLR group exhibited a higher prevalence of peripheral atherosclerotic plaques than the LDLR group (93.4% vs. 73%, p < 0.05), while coronary artery calcification (CAC) presence was more prevalent in the LDLR group compared with the NLDLR group (74.7% vs. 48%, p < 0.01). In a secondary analysis the study population was stratified into three groups based on LDLR genotype: NLDLR, LDLR defective, LDLR null groups. The prevalence of LGS progressively increased from the NLDLR to the LDLR null group, while HGS showed an inverse trend (p for trend < 0.05). Peripheral atherosclerotic plaque prevalence decreased from the NLDLR to the LDLR null group (p for trend < 0.05), while CAC prevalence increased progressively in the three groups (p for trend < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that FH groups with an LDLR mutation were inversely associated with HGS (p for both < 0.01) and the LDLR null group exhibited the strongest association. Conclusions FH subjects with NLDLR mutations exhibited a worse glycemic profile, while null LDLR mutations showed the strongest inverse association with HGS. The integrations of genetic, lipid and glucose data could be useful to better identify the metabolic profile and the atherosclerosis distribution in FH subjects.