Autor según el artículo: DE ANDRÉS-SÁNCHEZ J; DE TORRES-BURGOS F; Arias-Oliva M
Departamento: Gestió d'Empreses
Autor/es de la URV: Arias Oliva, Mario / De Andrés Sànchez, Jorge
Palabras clave: Techno doping Multidimensional ethical scale Ethical judgements Disruptive technology Carbon plate shoes
Resumen: Problem Statement: The development of Vaporfly technology (VFT), which was introduced by Nike in 2017, caused a disruption in long-distance running races. Using these shoes, an unexpected number of records in all standardized road distances have been broken. Scientific literature indicates that VFT improves performance, at least in highly trained athletes. This resulted in an extensive ethical discussion about the use of VFT in competitions and led to the development of a set of norms (which have been approved in 2020 by World Athletics) on the use of this technology. Purpose: This study analyses how ethical factors in multidimensional ethics scale (MES) developed by Shawver & Sennetti (2009) influence the acceptance of VFT shoes. The attitude is measured using the psychometrical scale proposed by Venkatesh & Davis (2000). Approach: Relations between variables have been fitted with a structural equation model, which has been adjusted with partial least squares. Thus, the influence of every explanatory variable on acceptance is measured with a so-called coefficient of the path (cp), whose value is within [-1, 1]. Its interpretation is analogous to that of a correlation coefficient. Results: We have determined that relativism (cp = 0.388, p < 0.01) and egoism (cp = 0.241, p < 0.01) are relevant ethical variables for explaining the acceptance of VFT. Likewise, moral equity (cp = 0.12, p = 0.262) and utilitarianism (cp = 0.098, p = 0.13) show a positive relation with attitude towards VFT. However, these relations are not significant at standard statistical levels. In addition, we have determined that contractualism shows a negative non-significant relation with intention to use.Conclusions: The influence of ethical factors on the intention to use a disruptive sport technology, such as the Nike Vaporfly running shoes, has been confirmed. Ethics explains almost 50% of the intention to use this technology.
Áreas temáticas: Sports science Psicología Physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation Pedagogical & educational research Medicina ii Medicina i Interdisciplinary research in the social sciences Interdisciplinar Educação física Ciencias sociales
Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
Direcció de correo del autor: mario.arias@urv.cat jorge.deandres@urv.cat jorge.deandres@urv.cat
Identificador del autor: 0000-0002-6874-4036 0000-0002-7715-779X 0000-0002-7715-779X
Fecha de alta del registro: 2024-07-27
Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Enlace a la fuente original: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3855049
URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: Journal Of Physical Education And Sport. 21 3203-3210
Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: DE ANDRÉS-SÁNCHEZ J; DE TORRES-BURGOS F; Arias-Oliva M (2021). Evaluating ethical awareness of amateur athletes about disruptive sport technology: the case of Nike Vaporfly road running shoes. Journal Of Physical Education And Sport, 21(), 3203-3210. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s6438
DOI del artículo: 10.7752/jpes.2021.s6438
Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Año de publicación de la revista: 2021
Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
Repositori URV