Articles producció científica> Bioquímica i Biotecnologia

Comparative understanding and preference of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery in a sample of Spanish consumers

  • Datos identificativos

    Identificador: imarina:9290115
    Autores:
    Fialon, MBabio, NSalas-Salvadó, JGalan, PKesse-Guyot, ETouvier, MDeschasaux-Tanguy, MSarda, BHercberg, SKhoury, NNabec, LJulia, C
    Resumen:
    Interpretive front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) are supported by World Health Organization as an important policy tool to promote healthy diets. At present, various FoPLs formats co-exist in the European Union (EU). However, as part of the Farm to Fork strategy published in 2020, the European Commission stated that it would propose a single mandatory FoPL. The aim of this study was to analyze Spanish consumers' preference and objective understanding of Nutri-Score and NutrInform, two FoPLs that are currently the subject of debate in the EU.In a representative sample of 1026 Spanish adults (50% women, mean age ± SD = 46 ± 14 years), objective understanding was assessed by asking participants to identify the healthiest food products in three food categories (breakfast products, breakfast cereals and added fats). The preference dimensions were tested by asking participants about the perceived helpfulness of the FoPL in discriminating the nutritional quality of food products (subjective understanding) and their overall assessment of the FoPL's ease of use, informativeness, trust and liking (perception).In terms of objective understanding, Nutri-Score was significantly associated with an increase in consumers' ability to identify healthier food products across all food categories compared with NutrInform [OR (odds ratio) = 19.1 [14.2-25.7], P < 0.0001]. On the preference dimension, Nutri-Score was perceived as significantly easier to use and was more liked than NutrInform (standardized principal component analysis dimension, respectively, 0.32 ± 1.58 vs. -0.29 ± 1.66, P < 0.0001 and 0.080 ± 1.18 vs. -0.072 ± 1.17, P = 0.039).This study provides new evidence to support Nutri-Score in comparison with NutrInform in Spanish consumers, on both objective understanding and preference asp
  • Otros:

    Autor según el artículo: Fialon, M; Babio, N; Salas-Salvadó, J; Galan, P; Kesse-Guyot, E; Touvier, M; Deschasaux-Tanguy, M; Sarda, B; Hercberg, S; Khoury, N; Nabec, L; Julia, C
    Departamento: Bioquímica i Biotecnologia
    Autor/es de la URV: Babio Sánchez, Nancy Elvira / Salas Salvadó, Jorge
    Resumen: Interpretive front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) are supported by World Health Organization as an important policy tool to promote healthy diets. At present, various FoPLs formats co-exist in the European Union (EU). However, as part of the Farm to Fork strategy published in 2020, the European Commission stated that it would propose a single mandatory FoPL. The aim of this study was to analyze Spanish consumers' preference and objective understanding of Nutri-Score and NutrInform, two FoPLs that are currently the subject of debate in the EU.In a representative sample of 1026 Spanish adults (50% women, mean age ± SD = 46 ± 14 years), objective understanding was assessed by asking participants to identify the healthiest food products in three food categories (breakfast products, breakfast cereals and added fats). The preference dimensions were tested by asking participants about the perceived helpfulness of the FoPL in discriminating the nutritional quality of food products (subjective understanding) and their overall assessment of the FoPL's ease of use, informativeness, trust and liking (perception).In terms of objective understanding, Nutri-Score was significantly associated with an increase in consumers' ability to identify healthier food products across all food categories compared with NutrInform [OR (odds ratio) = 19.1 [14.2-25.7], P < 0.0001]. On the preference dimension, Nutri-Score was perceived as significantly easier to use and was more liked than NutrInform (standardized principal component analysis dimension, respectively, 0.32 ± 1.58 vs. -0.29 ± 1.66, P < 0.0001 and 0.080 ± 1.18 vs. -0.072 ± 1.17, P = 0.039).This study provides new evidence to support Nutri-Score in comparison with NutrInform in Spanish consumers, on both objective understanding and preference aspects.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
    Áreas temáticas: Sociologia i política Saúde coletiva Public, environmental & occupational health Public health, environmental and occupational health Nutrição Medicine (all) Medicina ii Medicina i Matemática / probabilidade e estatística Enfermagem Economia Ciencias sociales
    Acceso a la licencia de uso: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
    Direcció de correo del autor: jordi.salas@urv.cat nancy.babio@urv.cat
    Identificador del autor: 0000-0003-2700-7459 0000-0003-3527-5277
    Fecha de alta del registro: 2024-08-03
    Versión del articulo depositado: info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
    URL Documento de licencia: https://repositori.urv.cat/ca/proteccio-de-dades/
    Referencia al articulo segun fuente origial: European Journal Of Public Health. 33 (2): 293-298
    Referencia de l'ítem segons les normes APA: Fialon, M; Babio, N; Salas-Salvadó, J; Galan, P; Kesse-Guyot, E; Touvier, M; Deschasaux-Tanguy, M; Sarda, B; Hercberg, S; Khoury, N; Nabec, L; Julia, (2023). Comparative understanding and preference of Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery in a sample of Spanish consumers. European Journal Of Public Health, 33(2), 293-298. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad002
    Entidad: Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    Año de publicación de la revista: 2023
    Tipo de publicación: Journal Publications
  • Palabras clave:

    Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
    Sociologia i política
    Saúde coletiva
    Public, environmental & occupational health
    Public health, environmental and occupational health
    Nutrição
    Medicine (all)
    Medicina ii
    Medicina i
    Matemática / probabilidade e estatística
    Enfermagem
    Economia
    Ciencias sociales
  • Documentos:

  • Cerca a google

    Search to google scholar