A novel approach for designing efficient and sustainable cooling cycles with low global warming potential refrigerants

Identificador:  imarina:9369109

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/imarina9369109

Autores:  Albà, CG; Alkhatib, III; Llovell, F; Vega, LF

Resumen:
With the current legislation on the phase-out of 3rd generation refrigerants, new cooling cycles are expected to operate with 4th generation refrigerants, hence, the need for optimal system performance with these new working fluids. In this study, an innovative optimization approach was applied for the design of cooling cycles with 4th generation refrigerants based on integrating statistical analysis design of experiments (DoE) with molecular modeling using the polar soft-SAFT model. First, a detailed multi-criteria assessment was applied for the selection of 4th generation refrigerants in medium-low temperature applications. Results demonstrated the potentiality of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (R1234ze(E)) or cis-1,2,3,3,3-pentafluoroprop-1-ene (R1225ye (Z)) in terms of environmental, safety, and technical criteria in basic cooling cycles under specific operating conditions. Multi-objective optimization guided using statistical analysis tools were implemented to study potential enhancement in cooling cycle performance using these promising refrigerants in terms of energy and exergy efficiency. This included evaporator and condenser temperature, fluid choice, compression yield, superheating/subcooling degrees, and cycle type. The evaporation and condenser temperature, and the compressor efficiency are shown to monopolize more than three-quarters of the cumulative contribution on system efficiency for those operated with R1234ze(E) in advanced liquid-to-suction line heat exchangers (LL/SL-IHX). Further optimization through examining the effect of heat transfer phenomena assisted in determining optimal operating conditions for new systems operating with low GWP refrigerants, instilling annual cost savings of $1.59 K and reduction in CO2 emissions by 1.02 tCO(2)-eq compared to the baseline system.