Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD): registro NADYA. Año 2000.

Identificador:  PC:1655

Handle: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11797/PC1655

Autors:  J. Salas; M. Planas, M.; Castellá, M.; León, A. M. Pita; P. García Peris; P. Gómez Enterría; C. Gómez Candela; M. Forga; E. Martí Bonmatí; A. Pérez de la Cruz; J. Ordóñez; A. Rodríguez Pozo; E. Camarero; J. A. Carrera; Grupo NADYA-SENPE

Resum:
Aim: We analyse the registered data of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in our country during the year 2000. Method: The data were collected through a previously designed questionnaire. Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the disease to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, and progress. All data were processed and analysed by the co-ordinating team. Results: Fourteen hospitals participated, and 67 patients were enrolled. Middle age was 5 ± 4 years for patients < 14 years old, and 48 ± 15 years for those ≥ 14 years old. The more prevalent diagnosis were: ischemic bowel (28.4%), neoplasm (16.4%), radiation enteritis (13.4%), motility disorders (7.5%), Crohn’s disease (2.9%), and other. The mean time on HPN was 7.5 ± 4.4 months. Tunelized catheter was the preferential route (77.6%), followed by the implanted one (20.9%). The intermittent method (nocturnal) was preferential (91.0%). Patients receive the formula from hospital pharmacy more frequently than from Nutriservice (71.5% versus 19.4%). The complications related to nutrition (0.32/100 days of HPN) included the infections (0.12 catheter sepsis/100 d of HPN), metabolic (0.06/100 d of HPN), mechanic (0.03/100 d of HPN) and electrolytic disorders (0.03/100 d of HPN). The readmission rate, for nutritional problems, was 0.3 hospitalizations /100 d of HPN. At the end of the year, 61.2% of the patients remained in the HPN program, 37.3% abandoned the treatment (due to death (40%), to progress to oral feeding (48%), and to progress to enteral nutrition (4%); and 1.5% of the patients were not follow up. Conclusions: This review illustrates that there is an increment in